Request for Information Submissions
Name | Response | Attachments | Submitted Sort ascending |
---|---|---|---|
Mario Vega | The new rules have made the process more easily understood by employees. | No Attachments |
2018-03-28 |
Carl shinkle | Number 1 leave alone without change to 2014 rule | No Attachments |
2018-03-27 |
C. Butler | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-03-25 |
Jim Conaghan #134 | #3 Rescind the 2014 Electoin Rule | No Attachments |
2018-03-23 |
Joshua Heuertz | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. The new rules allow employees who want to vote in an election to do so soon after they file a petition with the NLRB, without an extended delay. That is what employees want. | No Attachments |
2018-03-22 |
Alfonso N. Lopez SMART Local 88 Organizer | I also request that the 2014 election rule remain as is. | No Attachments |
2018-03-21 |
Manuel Gonzalez | Please see attached letter. | No Attachments |
2018-03-21 |
Michael Hogan | The amendments are simple, reduce the need for lawsuits, and strike a good balance between the democratic rights of workers and the right for employers to advocate on their own behalf. The change or elimination is unnecessary. | No Attachments |
2018-03-21 |
Rick Becker | The amendments to the procedures adopted in December 2014 represent modest and common-sense changes in the processing of petitions for an election.I urge the Board not to alter the amendments.. | No Attachments |
2018-03-21 |
Geisinger Health | Geisinger submits and supports rescinding the 2014 Election Rule and requiring the Board to revert to the election regulations that were in effect prior to the 2014 Election Rule’s adoption. See attached. | No Attachments |
2018-03-21 |
Greg Suydam | 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-03-20 |
rob mcbeth | The 2014 election rule should be rescinded. I believe that the prior rule is fair to bot the workers and companies alike and it should be returned to the rules in place prior to 2014. | No Attachments |
2018-03-20 |
Amanda Sager | The current rules do not give an advantage to unions or pro-union employees. Before our election, the employer was able to reach all employees with its messages. | No Attachments |
2018-03-19 |
Devin Leingang | I ask that the board leave the election rule the way it is. If it's not Broken don't fix it. | No Attachments |
2018-03-19 |
Kal Rohde | I do not see a need to change the process that is in place now. I do not see a problem for either side on keeping what is in place. So why our we changing something that is not broken? | No Attachments |
2018-03-19 |
Paulie Williams | I think the NLRB should leave the rules the same. I believe the process is the fairest yet. Business owners already can sit their employees down during work time as long as they want. | No Attachments |
2018-03-19 |
Joshua W. Diemart | I believe the 2014 Election Rule should remain unchanged. From things I have read, employees have appreciated the quicker elections. Are they not the voices that should carry the most weight? | No Attachments |
2018-03-19 |
Scott Davis | These rules don’t give any advantage to union or the companies. | No Attachments |
2018-03-19 |
Shane Guyer | They have not given an advantage to either employers or unions.Our union asks the Board not to revoke or change the amendments | No Attachments |
2018-03-19 |
Brad M | Leave the rules as-is. Companies like AUTONATION simply use the excess time to threaten and fire union supporters before the election can take place. | No Attachments |
2018-03-18 |
Kim vaughn | Do not change the rules at this time. | No Attachments |
2018-03-17 |
Daniel J. Chacon Sr. | 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
Ivan Meyen | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
David R. Heath | CAPTCHA | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
Brian Noble | I would like to see the procedures remain!! | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
Aaron R. Bailey | I ask the Board not to revoke or change the amendments. | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
Dave Sylvester | Why would we change the rules now? When what’s in place already has been working. | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
Carl Cacioppo-Director of Market Development SMART | RFI answers re: 2014 Election Rule 1. Yes 2. No 3. No | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
Leroy Smith | The rule should be retained without modifications. The NLRB is meant to sustain fair bargaining. Changing the rule will make employees for susceptible to anti-union lawyers. | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
John Curtin | I do not believe the Board should change these procedures. The new rules have made the process more easily understood by employees. | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
Donna Memmer | Request to keep the 2014 Election Rule in tact with no changes. | No Attachments |
2018-03-16 |
Trish Cook | Please revert to the old time line to allow employers time to respond! No on like to be surprised, and this is just what this short time line does! | No Attachments |
2018-03-15 |
Mark Smith | The rule needs to go back to the way it was to allow management time to respond! Need to be fair to all parties, not just unions. | No Attachments |
2018-03-15 |
Cliff Sanderson | I am a veteran human resource executive and strongly believe that the shortened election window will harm employee relations. This is shortened cycle time is a thinly veiled attempt to bolster the ranks of dues paying union members. | No Attachments |
2018-03-15 |
Jacob Shipman | The amendments to the procedures adopted in December 2014 have improved the process. Our union asks the Board not to revoke or change the amendments. | No Attachments |
2018-03-14 |
Jesse Buell | see attached | No Attachments |
2018-03-14 |
Philip | I have seen firsthand the benefits of organizing. I urge the Board to retain the 2014 Election Rule without changes! The rule in question provides for an even playing field - a standard championed by most Americans. | No Attachments |
2018-03-14 |
Anonymous | See attached. | No Attachments |
2018-03-14 |
Chris Tveitbakk | I am an employee who recently participated in an election conducted by the NLRB. I do not believe the Board should change those procedures. | No Attachments |
2018-03-14 |
Cynthia Sauter | The 2014 Election Rule should revert back. Shortening the time frame from petition to election denies an Employer their opportunity to wage an appropriate communication campaign designed to allow an Employee to make an educated choice. | No Attachments |
2018-03-14 |
Toriano green | I received an letter for an settlement agreement with Anderson enterprises trying to see what i need to do please call me at9013036820 | No Attachments |
2018-03-13 |
Barry Tillis | Please keep NLRB elections as they currently are. The current procedure is fair to employees, the previous procedure was not , it allowed employers to coerce its workers to vote no but Union reps would not have the same opportunity. | No Attachments |
2018-03-13 |
Roxanne Rosas | I recently observed an election that benefited from the current NLRB rules. Please don't change them. Thanks | No Attachments |
2018-03-12 |
John Garretson | Attached is IBEW Local Union 304's comments regarding the election rules, we believe the rules currently level the playing field for each party. Thanks John L Garretson II Business Manager Financial Secretary IBEW Local Union 304 | No Attachments |
2018-03-12 |
Robert Snurpus | The rule should be retained, and modified, to allow unions to have captive audience meetings in the same room as the employer. At different times of course, maybe even alternating times. | No Attachments |
2018-03-10 |
Arthur A Reihl | Sirs; Beginning in 2015, the NLRB updated its Election Rule, to streamline the election process and removed many of the barriers. The updated procedures serve employees well and are pro-worker. I do not believe these new rules should be changed. | No Attachments |
2018-03-08 |
Joseph D weber | I have attached a pdf with my short response against the repeal. I am in favor of the current rules. | No Attachments |
2018-03-08 |
Becky Braddock | the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change | No Attachments |
2018-03-07 |
Thomas L Phelps | You are not working for Donald Trump, you are supposed to be working for the working citizens of America. We have the right to organize and do not need any more infringements on that right. | No Attachments |
2018-03-07 |
Anonymous | 1. Yes, the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. There is plenty of opportunity for the Employer to reach employees currently and to revert to the old Rule skews the opportunity to present all sides fairly. | No Attachments |
2018-03-07 |