Request for Information Submissions
| Name | Response | Attachments | Submitted Sort ascending |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dale Johnson | The 2014 Election rule should be retained without change.Americas workers,who the president keeps promising to help,need all the help they can get.To rescind or weaken this rule would be a slap in our faces.Please keep the rule as is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| Linzel Ham | The 2014 election rule should be kept as is | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| Casey Sweeney | The 2014 election rule absolutely should be retained without change. Workers deserve quick and fair NLRB elections. I have seen firsthand the benefit to expediting a process that allows both parties to move forward after an election. | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| Gabriel Romo | Keep as it is!!! | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| Richard Romo | It Should Kept The Same.. Once The Employee's Have Signed Authorization Cards They Have Spoken For Union Representation, The Frame Is Perfect As Is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| Brian ilic | It should be kept the same. | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| Raymond Lanning | To whom it may concern, The 2014 Election Rule should be retained WITHOUT CHANGES at this current time. \",",","," 40" | No Attachments |
2017-12-16 |
| Katherine Doyle | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2017-12-16 |
| Anonymous | Retain the 2014 rule without change. Workers have a hard enough time fighting for their rights without the government stepping in and doing the bidding of corporations to make it more difficult for workers to organize. | No Attachments |
2017-12-16 |
| Jesse Gauger-Kiraly | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2017-12-16 |
| Malcolm Emerich | 1. Yes. 2. No. 3. No. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Frank Voso | I believe the 2014 Election Rule should be retained. The longer you drag out the process just lets the Companies have more time to intimidate the Workers. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Jayanni Webster | The 2014 election rule should be retained without change b/c it's the most democratic and fair way to structure elections. Workers deserve expeditious NLRB elections to reduce any outside influence or intimidation. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Adam DeRose | The 2014 election rule should be retained without change. It's important for workers to have speedy NLRB elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Saqib Bhatti | The 2014 election rule absolutely should be retained without change. Workers deserve quick and fair NLRB elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Dana Smith | The 2014 election rule absolutely should be retained without change. Workers deserve quick and fair NLRB elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Margot Nikitas | The 2014 election rule absolutely should be retained without change. Workers deserve quick and fair NLRB elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Bill Barry | Absolutely keep the current 2014 Election Rule--it's more democratic than any previous regulation. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| david | rescind the 2014 election rule. Unions and employers should have adequate time to present their views to the workers | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Sarah Haendler | Keep the rule in its entirety- strong unions are critical to the strength of America’s middle class. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Walter Tillman | As a Union member, I think the rule should should be retained as is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Kay Smith | Rescind thr rule. No one should have to make a decision affecting their livelihood in the amount of time stated in this rule. We all need time to hear both sides. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Kay Smith | Rescind thr rule. No one should have to make a decision aff their livelihood in the amount of time stated in this rule. We all need time to hear both sides. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| William Olwig | Leave The election regulations alone! | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Melanie A. Thompson, SHRM-SCP, SPHR | Question 1 Response: Absolutely not Question 2 Response: Absolutely not; there's nothing worth saving. Question 3 Response: An emphatic YES. Revert to the regulations that were in effect prior to the 2014 rule's adoption. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Tony Hawk | The 2014 Election Rule should definitely be rescinded. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Clay Barker | The Board should fully rescind the 2014 Election Rule. The Board should revert to the Representation Election Regulations that were in effect prior to the 2014 Election Rule’s adoption. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Terry Wright | the rule should NOT be changed. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Karen Isaacson | As a former union member, and knowing that employers are usually aware of the reasons that unions are formed (to better protect employee rights against violation by those same employers), I believe that the rule should be maintained as it is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Mark McManis | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Mrs. Dorrie Jones | No employer who didn't abuse his/her staff would object to unionization meetings. So why give the bad ones a chance to dissuade his/her personnel ? This only helps, and hurts no one. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Stephen M. Jones | The present rule regarding union elections should be kept in place. It poses no problems for employers, and supports the rights of employees to unionize. Dismissing the current rule would unfairly tip the scales in the favor of employers. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Thomas A. Pontolillo | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change because the law heavily favors employers without it. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Anonymous | Yes, the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. Rescinding the Rule and/or modifying it is just another feeble attempt to hinder the organizing process. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Leroy Smith | Should be retained. | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| Howard Neilson | Remain the same. | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| Steve Cox | The 2014 election rules should be revised to allow at least 6 weeks between the filing of a petition and the election. To have less time for election campaign period violates core principle of free & fair elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| Stu Helfer | Keep it as it currently is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| Stu Helfer | Keep it as it currently is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| Patrick Casanova | Rescind the election rule. Thank you. | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| John Strang | I think the 2014 revised laws should remain and/or be increased for workers. I am a Union organizer and have had many representation elections. Nowadays workers are much more apt to be intimidated by Union busting attorneys and employers. I've seen it first hand many times. I know ULP's can be filed and the NLRB does a great job ensuring that workers have protected rights. But at the end of the day, workers are scared and intimidated. The one who writes their checks every week will win over most of the time. I hope this president does not inhibit or downsize the NLRB. You guys do a great job. I wish you could do more... | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| Scott Bates | 1. Should the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change? NO 2. Should the 2014 Election Rule be retained with modifications? If so, what should be modified? NO 3. Should the 2014 Election Rule be rescinded? YES If so, should the Board revert to the Representation Election Regulations that were in effect prior to the 2014 Election Rule’s adoption, or should the Board make changes to the prior Representation Election Regulations? Revert to the Representation Election Regulations that were in effect prior to the 2014 Election Rule’s adoption. If the Board should make changes to the prior Representation Election Regulations, what should be changed? No changes, just rescind the 2014 election regulations. | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| Angela mcentire | Isa company aloud to not give a break for someonw to just not have enough time to get something to eat in a 8 hr shift | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |