The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, May 16, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, May 19, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday at 11:00 pm ET until Saturday at 1:30 pm ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Home

Reports

Reviewing Reports

Request for Information Submissions

Showing 5251 - 5300 of 6943. Show 10 | 50 | 100 | 1000 | All results per page.

Name	Response	Attachments	Submitted Sort ascending
Wallace E couch	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Arthur Burr	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Rev. Dr. Ronald L. Sims	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Gary Burns	I was a dues paying Union Member while working for the Federal Government. I did not have to be as the US Government is a right to work environment. I do not want Unions to be able to force their way in and then steel the voice from the workers.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Stephen Russell	Make elections Open & have Neutral parties manage elections, NO Unions. Maybe a business or industries Consumers can. CUT waste & fraud in NLRB alone. Update elections Post results online.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Joe Davidson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Brian J. Zink	I'm writing as a former union member to urge you to rescind the 2014 Election Rule.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Nancy Marlett	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Sarah Woodring	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charles Holliday	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
chris falino	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ken Copp	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charles Kusler	They just need to outlaw all unions.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Leon J Panko	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Otto Lamsfuss	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Alex Czarniecki	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bob LaDuke	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mike Shannon	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Gary Conley	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Adam Julius	Rescind the 2014 rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Faye M Barton	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Dave Hansen	Please rescind the 2014 Rule. Also, protect future workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support, AND by eliminating all impediments to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Phillip Cunningham	It's time to take away the union advantages over businesses when it comes to organizing. If the worker's truly want the union, subterfuge and false advertising aren't required. Please institute new union election rules that are fair to both sides.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Allen D Gibson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Yeoman	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
B.James	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Voltaire Cortez	Keep the 2014 Election Rule exactly as it is. Y'all should be helping working people join Unions, not to make it harder.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
William C Robinson	leave the 2014 Election rule as is,no changes needed	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Scott joel	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-11
Sharon Moynihan	The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-04-11
Cody Mecham	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-11
Michael Foster	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-11
IAM union steward Bill Gunlock	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-11
Frank Prochaska	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. The rule reduced the amount of unnecessary delay in the election process. The existing rule has successfully reduced time and administrative burden from this process and should be retained.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Brian Townsend	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Karla Walter	See attached document	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Paul Schubert	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Kirk Nordberg	Election regulations should be retained in there present form.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Doug Fox	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change!!!	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Paul Port	Don’t change nothing	No Attachments	2018-04-10
YVETTE DE LA CRUZ	Retain the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change. The 2014 Election Rule provides working people to exercise their rights in a timely manner without undue interference. Protect our freedom to exercise our rights - retain without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Denise Strike	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these ruls, there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Kelly Kirkland	This rule is a good example of a change that has reduced unnecessary delays in government process. I feel strongly it should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Franklin Moss	The current rules are far superior to the prior practices. They lead to efficiency and fairness. They should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Harris Schwartzreich	Please retain the 2014 election rule without change so that workers have the right to a timely union vote.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
William Funari	The 2014 election rule should be retained without change. It was a majir imorivement.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Ziadee Cambier	Please retain the 2014 Election Rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Allan Foster	Retain rules without modification.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Brandon Bray	Keep the rule. Working people need their voices heard, and the ability to form a union is a right.	No Attachments	2018-04-09