Request for Information Submissions
| Name | Response | Attachments | Submitted Sort ascending |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | Please see attachment. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Steve Dufresne | Please see attachment for my feedback/comments/concerns. Thanks. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Russell Baldwin | I feel it necessary to repeal the current rules and to reinstate the prior rules. Revise the process so that any and every election will be held with integrity and to be fair to all parties involved. It's time to stop favoring unions. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Chuck Newell | See attached response | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Anonymous | Please see attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Jeffery Porter | See attachment | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Mike Blau | Team members and companies should not have to worry about being blindsided by unions. We are taking very good care of our team and all a union will do is cost us more money, money that can be used for team members instead of layoffs. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| JD Donoho | See attached response. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Kevin Schort | See attached response. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Brett Hogan | See Attached | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Scott Brackin | I am against the current election rules because they are unfair to employers and their team members. The current rules were implemented to make unions’ work easier, not to ensure an informed vote or a fair election. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Jacob Guinn | See Attached | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Kevin Lindell | Please read attached file. Ignore previous submission. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Chad Rome | See attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Kevin Lindell | Please read attached file for my opinion. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Joe Carter | See Attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Eric Hillis | See Attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Bill Hawthorne | Please see attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Clay Appleberry | See attached.... | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Kenneth Birch | Yes | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Steve Langford | see attached | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Brandon Almond | Attached | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Jason Berg | I urge the NLRB to REPEAL the current rules; REINSTATE the prior rules; then REVISE and modernize them in a balanced way. The current rules are overly slanted towards unions and don't give voters the chance to cast a fully informed vote. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Steve Dudley | See attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Rick Morrot | Please see attachment for my comments Thank you. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Scott Van Sande | See attached response | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Anonymous | See attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Randy Dickson | See attached | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Mike Tressler | See Attached | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Joe Krueger | See attached | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Artie Tonan | My response is attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Pat Spencer | See attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Michelle Walters | See attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| David LoPresti | Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the current election rules. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Trey Bryan | Please see my attached response. | No Attachments |
2018-01-19 |
| Kim Garrett | Keep the policy as is. Do not change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-18 |
| Marc Pacione | i would like to retain the current election process. | No Attachments |
2018-01-18 |
| Bernie Hall | The rules should remain in place as-is. Frankly, if any changes were to be made they should provide stronger protections for workers from employers. | No Attachments |
2018-01-17 |
| Kyle kelchen | My union is not following our contract. I would like to send you the appropriate documents. The uaw local 94 refuses to give me the paperwork. Any advice on what to do next...? | No Attachments |
2018-01-15 |
| J OConnor | Rescind the 2014 Election rule. Revert to regulations in effect prior to the 2014 rules adoption. | No Attachments |
2018-01-15 |
| Leigh Skilling | You are gutting the meager protections of the working people of America. This is criminal. The rule should be retained with out change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-14 |
| Charles Yancey | 1. The Final Rule should be retained without change. 2. The Final Rule should not be modified. 3. The Final Rule should not be rescinded. There should be no reversion nor changes to prior Regulations. | No Attachments |
2018-01-12 |
| Robert Koerschner | The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change! | No Attachments |
2018-01-12 |
| Anonymous | Retain the 2014 Election Rule as is. | No Attachments |
2018-01-11 |
| John Kahrhoff | See the attached letter in support of the 2014 Election Rule. | No Attachments |
2018-01-11 |
| Justin Williams | Retain the 2014 NLRB Election Rule. The NLRB is meant to protect workers and to allow for a fair election process. Any changes will inhibit the election process and the right for a fair election process. | No Attachments |
2018-01-11 |
| Planned Building Services Inc. | Case # 22-CB-212325 Response Questionnaire | No Attachments |
2018-01-11 |
| Nathan Gilbert | One of the key aims of the Act is to allow workers to exercise their right to select a collective bargaining representative freely and fairly without undue employer interference. The 2014 Rule is grounded in this principle and should be retained. | No Attachments |
2018-01-10 |
| Alan Rubenstein | Retain the 2014 NLRB Election Rule. NLRB is to protect workers and to allow for a fair election process. Any changes will inhibit the election process and the right for a fair election process. | No Attachments |
2018-01-10 |
| Frank D Jacobs | The 2014 should be retained without changes. The time period gives both sides time to get information to the employees. Additional time would only allow the employer more time attempting to scare the employees with false information. | No Attachments |
2018-01-10 |
| David L. Heidbreder | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. This rule seems to level the playing field when it comes to the workers vs. the companies. | No Attachments |
2018-01-10 |
| John Kahrhoff | The Rule helps offset the advantage Employers have with regards to collective action by workers. Along w/ captive audience meetings after filing, employers have more economic resources than workers. One real-life example is shown in the attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-10 |
| llama | Llamas are a key and vital part of this society because he is king!!!!! Jeff the Llama is awesome!!! | No Attachments |
2018-01-09 |
| Jerry Reed | The 2014 rule should not be retained and should be rescinded. The decision to elect union representation is a difficult one for employees. They want to hear both sides of an argument to make an informed decision. | No Attachments |
2018-01-04 |
| Elle Farmer | (1) Yes, NLRB should retain the 2014 Election Rule without Change (2) Absent Yes to question (1), yes, NLRB should retain with minimal, non-substantial changes. (3) No. NLRB should not rescind the 2014 Election rules | No Attachments |
2018-01-03 |
| David S. Addington | See attachment | No Attachments |
2018-01-03 |
| Brandon Elvey | These questions have already been asked and answered a few years ago. There are no issues with the Elections rules, therefore they should remain unchanged. See attachment for further response. | No Attachments |
2018-01-02 |
| Anonymous | The dissenting views of member Mark Gaston Pearce and member Lauren McFerran are compelling. The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-01 |
| Brad Meyer | After living through multiple violations by AUTONATION in 2008 including threats and firings in order to scare the workers against unionization I vote TO KEEP the current set of election rules set forth in 2014. | No Attachments |
2017-12-28 |
| L G Hansen | I respond to the above questions: Item 3 shall be my choice with rules reverting to old rules. Thank you | No Attachments |
2017-12-26 |
| John D. Sager | The 2014 NLRB election rule should be retained. Any change to lengthen the the election time frame will result in increased employer intimidation against the free will of employees. | No Attachments |
2017-12-22 |
| Kendra Saunders | I request that NLRBRequest for information regarding representation election regulations. | No Attachments |
2017-12-22 |
| Louis Galluzzo | Ruke does not need any changes | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| Scott C. Eickholt | Leave the rule unchanged. NLRB was created to protect the WORKERS not the business. The rule is appropriate for a fair election process. Change would undermine the workers ability to organize. History shows the business works to divide the workers. | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| Scott C. Eickholt | Leave the rule unchanged. NLRB was created to protect the WORKERS not the business. The rule is appropriate for a fair election process. Change would undermine the workers ability to organize. History shows the business works to divide the workers. | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| karen mercer | no change | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| Amit Kumar | Sir/mam, My name is Amit Kumar. Graduate in civil engineering. Seeking for a job. Kindly excuse my request. Thank you. | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| Larry Jarvis | Retain 2014 election rules | No Attachments |
2017-12-20 |
| Jason Biniasz | The rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2017-12-20 |
| Jason Jenkins | I am requesting that the 2014 Election rule be retained without any alteration | No Attachments |
2017-12-20 |
| Bob Cantore | It should be retained without modifications. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Bob Cantore | It should be retained without modifications. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Bob Cantore | It should be retained without modifications. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Stephen Mellgard | Retained without changing... | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Charles E. Tubbs | The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| David S. Addington for Nat'l Fed'n of Independent Business (NFIB) | NFIB comments of 12/19/2017 on Request for Information on "Representation-Case Procedures," 82 Fed. Reg. 58783 (12/14/2017) are attached. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Chad Rennison | The election rule should be retained with no revisions or modifications. Keep it the SAME. Speeding up elections hinders employee harassment by their employer for wanting a voice in their workplace. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Charles Skelly | Election rule should be retained without changes. It streamlines the process properly. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Chris Horton | The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Ray Trudell | This rule be retained. It does not need charging. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Kenneth Doogan | Please retain the 2014 Election Rule without change! | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Eric Theobald | Please no changes to the rule | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Marie Lobbezoo | The 2014 Election Rule should be rescinded. The Representation Election Rules in place prior to the 2014 Rule were adequate. "Ambush" elections were leading employees to be given inadequate information in a short period. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Jim Leatherman | Do not change the election rules for unions | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Tim Blandford | Yes the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| CL | I think the 2014 Election Rule should be rescinded. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Harry lim | No change | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Daniel J. Libby | #1 the 2014 rule should stay the same with no change | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Michael Hill | The 2014 election rule should not be changed and should be retained as is! | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Timothy Oppel | No change. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Bo | Keep it as is or if any changes are made , it is in benefit of the unions. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Kendra Fite | No, the Election Rule should not be retained, no modifications at all. The 2014 Election rule should be rescinded. This is harmful to businesses, especially small businesses who can not afford the cost of these changes. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Nathan Knott | I believe the voting rules need to remain the same! | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Mike Van Winkle | The current election rule should be retained WITHOUT any changes or modifications being made. The 2014 election rule speeds up the process and the employees are subject to less intimidation because of the rule. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Chris Brooks | The 2014 election rule absolutely should be retained without change. Workers deserve quick and fair NLRB elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| John Ertl | Research from Cornell's Kate Bronfenbrenner proves that that the longer employers have to violate the Act, the more egregious and systematic their illegal tactics become. The 2014 Election Rule is a no-brainer and should be kept. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Chris Spivey | Keep the ruling the same as it is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Katie Zucconi | Yes:2014 Election Rule retained without change. No:changes to the rule. No the rule should not be rescinded. Make it easier for employees to gain representation with a union and keep the "speedy election" rule so employees have a fair chance. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Todd Gardner | The election rule should NOT change! The rule helps protect the worker from the employer and their hired thugs(Union Busters, Attorneys)! Protect the worker! | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| JORDAN GALLEGOS | Yes for 2014 Election Rule retained without change. No for changes to the Rule. No the Rule should not be rescinded. Make it easier for employees to gain representation with a union and keep the “speedy election” rule so employees have a fair chance. | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |