Skip to main content

The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, November 21, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday night at 11:00 pm ET through Saturday morning at about 9:00 am ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.
The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

News & Publications

Newspapers

Witness testifies via international video conferencing in NLRB proceeding

Office of Public Affairs

202-273-1991

publicinfo@nlrb.gov

www.nlrb.gov

For the first time in the Agency’s history, attorneys in the Agency’s San Francisco Regional Office conducted a trial examination of a witness via international video conferencing. Administrative Law Judge Mary Cracraft permitted testimony by a witness via video conference from the U.S. Embassy in Madrid, Spain.  Judge Cracraft wrote that although the Board has not yet ruled on the use of video testimony in unfair labor practice cases, EF International Language Schools (the Employer) was not denied due process by utilization of videoconferencing technology for this witness’s testimony. She determined that, in certain circumstances, fact finders could similarly assess video and live testimony. 
In a decision issued September 15, 2014, Judge Cracraft found that the Employer violated the Act by threatening and terminating an employee because of her personal and e-mail discussions with co-workers about their terms and conditions of employment.