Skip to main content

The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, November 21, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday night at 11:00 pm ET through Saturday morning at about 9:00 am ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.
The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

News & Publications

Newspapers

Settlement ends long-running dispute involving immigrant workers at New York food wholesaler

Office of Public Affairs

202-273-1991

publicinfo@nlrb.gov

www.nlrb.gov

A kosher food product wholesaler in New York has agreed to settle a long-running NLRB case by paying $186,000 to former employees who lost their jobs in the midst of a union organizing campaign.
The settlement culminates a lengthy effort by the NLRB to enforce an order that Flaum Appetizing Corp. provide backpay to 17 former employees who were unlawfully discharged following a two-day strike. Flaum contended it did not have to pay because the employees were undocumented immigrants.
A decision in the case was issued by an Administrative Law Judge in February 2008, and upheld by the Board on appeal in June 2009. It found that the company committed multiple violations of federal labor law by alternately threatening and making promises to employees to discourage them from supporting the Industrial Workers of the World. The employer then unlawfully refused to allow employees to return to work following a two-day strike that the workers and union staged to protest the firing of a co-worker.
Following the 2009 Board Order, the NLRB Regional Office in Brooklyn calculated the amount of backpay owed by the employer.  In response, the employer claimed that the employees were owed no backpay because they were ineligible to work, but failed to set forth facts to support its claim.  The Board, in a  Supplemental Decision and Order in December 2011, dismissed the employer’s defense because it did not show it had a good faith basis to support its immigration-related claim. An Operations-Management memorandum issued to the regions last week offered further guidance.
The settlement was reached May 7, just before a Compliance Hearing regarding the accumulating backpay was due to begin. The $186,000 represents 80% of the entire amount that the NLRB determined employees would have earned had it not been for the unlawful discharges.
An additional agreement reached between Flaum and its former employees settles a separate lawsuit filed regarding allegations of unpaid overtime, bringing the total settlement amount to $577,000.