Summary of NLRB Decisions for Week of February 9 - 13, 2026
The Summary of NLRB Decisions is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for the opinions of the NLRB. Inquiries should be directed to the Office of the Executive Secretary at 202‑273‑1940.
Summarized Board Decisions
Transdev Services, Inc. (05-CA-352917; 374 NLRB No. 40) Baltimore, MD, February 10, 2026.
The Board granted the Acting General Counsel’s Motion for Summary Judgment in this test-of-certification case on the ground that the Respondent failed to raise any issues that were not, or could not have been, litigated in the underlying representation proceeding in which the Union was certified as the bargaining representative of a group of employees, as part of an existing unit. The Board found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing and refusing to recognize and bargain with the Union.
Charge filed by Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1764 a/w Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL–CIO, CLC. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
***
Hotel Equities Group LLC (16–CA–363860; 374 NLRB No. 36) Austin, TX, February 10, 2026.
The Board granted the Acting General Counsel’s Motion for Summary Judgment in this test-of-certification case on the ground that the Respondent failed to raise any issues that were not, or could not have been, litigated in the underlying representation proceeding in which the Union was certified as the bargaining representative. The Board found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing and refusing to recognize and bargain with the Union.
Charge filed by UNITE HERE Local 23. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
***
Satellite Healthcare, Inc.(32-RC-362037; 374 NLRB No. 39) San Jose, CA, February 10, 2026.
The Board denied the Employer’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Certification of Representative as it raised no substantial issues warranting review. For the reasons stated in Satellite Healthcare (Santa Rosa), 374 NLRB No. 25 (2026), the Board rejected the Employer’s contention that the Regional Director lacked the authority to continue processing the petition in the absence of a Board quorum. Members Murphy and Mayer stated that they did not participate in Amazon.com Services, 373 NLRB No. 136 (2024), an unfair labor practice case, and expressed no view on whether it was correctly decided; in their view, the Employer’s arguments in favor of overruling it were not properly cognizable in this representation proceeding.
Petitioner—Service Employees International Union—United Healthcare Workers—West. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
***
Qwest Corporation, a subsidiary of Lumen Technologies, Inc., f/k/a CenturyLink, Inc. (19-CA-284277, et al.; 374 NLRB No. 34) Seattle, WA, February 11, 2026.
The Board adopted but bolstered the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusion that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing to provide the Union with requested information concerning sections of a supervisory handbook addressing evaluations of employee performance. The Board reversed the judge’s conclusion that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing to provide requested documentation demonstrating that the Respondent’s software takes park and driving times into account as the Respondent demonstrated that it does not possess the requested documentation. The Board also remanded for a determinative credibility finding on the issue of whether the Respondent fulfilled or partially fulfilled the Union’s information request by providing clarifying information relating to software outages.
Charges filed by Communications Workers of America, Local 7800 and Communications Workers of America District 7. Administrative Law Judge Lisa D. Ross issued her decision on August 22, 2023. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated in the decision.
***
Unpublished Board Decisions in Representation and Unfair Labor Practice Cases
R Cases
IWS/Evergreen Recycling Solutions, LLC (22-RC-353986) Newark, NJ, February 9, 2026. The Board denied the Petitioner’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision to Dismiss as it raised no substantial issues warranting review. Petitioner—International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 125. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
Paragon Systems, Inc. (03-RC-336208) Rochester, NY, February 9, 2026. The Board granted the Petitioner’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Order to Dismiss Petition, finding that it raised substantial issues warranting review. On review, the Board found that, pursuant to Section 102.71(a)(5) of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, the petition raised issues (e.g., whether the Intervenor established that its contract with the Employer was bar-quality) which can best be resolved upon the basis of a record developed at a hearing. Petitioner—International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA). Intervenor—United Federation of Special Police and Security Officers, Inc. a/w United Federation/LEOS-PBA. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
Allied New York Services, Inc. (29-RM-337856) Jamaica, NY, February 10, 2026. The Board denied the Employer’s Request for the extraordinary relief of a stay of an election. Employer-Petitioner—Allied New York Services, Inc. Union—Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
Akima Global Services, LLC (12-RC-341538) Guaynabo, PR, February 11, 2026. The Board denied the Intervenor’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Direction of Election (in which he concluded that the successor bar did not apply), finding that it raised no substantial issues warranting review. Petitioner—Federal Contractors United of Puerto Rico (FCUPR). Intervenor—Union de Profesionales de la Seguridad Privada de Puerto Rico. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
Public Service Co. of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource Energy (01-RC-319255) Manchester, NH, February 12, 2026. The Board denied the Petitioner’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Order as it raised no substantial issues warranting review. Petitioner—International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1837. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
Doctors Hospital of Mantec (32-RC-376025) Manteca, CA, February 12, 2026. The Board denied the Employer’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s approval of the Petitioner’s request to withdraw as it raised no substantial issues warranting review. The Board also denied the Employer’s request for extraordinary relief as moot. Petitioner—Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare Workers – West. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
First Student, Inc. (13-UD-348838) Chicago, IL, February 12, 2026. The Board denied the Petitioner’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Order Dismissing Petition (in which the Regional Direction found the petition was not coextensive with the bargaining unit), finding that it raised no substantial issues warranting review. Petitioner—an individual. Union—International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 777. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
Aimbridge Employee Service Corp. (05-RC-352475) Washington, D.C., February 13, 2026. The Board denied the Employer’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision on Objections and Certification of Representative that overruled objections regarding alleged union and employee statements about employees losing their jobs, as it raised no substantial issues warranting review. Petitioner—UNITE HERE Local 25 a/w UNITE HERE, AFL-CIO, CLC. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
Titan Florida, LLC d/b/a Titan Concrete (12-RC-356803) Fort Lauderdale, FL, February 13, 2026. The Board denied the Employer’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision on Objections and Certification of Representative as it raised no substantial issues warranting review. The Regional Director had overruled the Employer’s election objection that the Board agents’ handling of the ballot boxes interfered with the fairness and validity of the election and found untimely the Employer’s election objection that the Regional Director was without the authority to administer the election because the Board lacked a quorum. In denying review, the Board noted that even if the quorum-related objection had been timely, it would still be meritless. Petitioner—Teamsters Local Union No. 769. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
C Cases
Amazon.com Services LLC (19-CA-295640 and 19-CA-342087) Seattle, WA, February 9, 2026. No exceptions having been filed to the December 2, 2025 decision of Administrative Law Judge Kimberly Sorg-Graves’ finding that the Respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices, the Board adopted the judge’s findings and conclusions, and ordered the Respondent to take the action set forth in the judge’s recommended Order. Charges filed by Committee of Correspondence of Amazon Workers and an individual.
Satellite Healthcare, Inc. (20-CA-315531, et al.) San Francisco Bay Area, CA, February 9, 2026. No exceptions having been filed to the April 2, 2025 decision of Administrative Law Judge Brian D. Gee’s finding that the Respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices, the Board adopted the judge’s findings and conclusions, and ordered the Respondent to take the action set forth in the judge’s recommended Order. Charges filed by Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare Workers—West.
United Parcel Service, Inc. (05-CA-321301 and 05-CB-324099) Carlisle, PA, February 12, 2026. The Board denied the Respondents’ separate motions for summary judgment, finding that they failed to establish that there are no genuine issues of material fact warranting a hearing and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Board’s denial was without prejudice to the Respondents’ right to renew their deferral arguments to the Administrative Law Judge and to raise the deferral issue before the Board on exceptions, if appropriate. Charges filed by an individual. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
Starbucks Corporation (16-CA-296159, et al.) Austin, TX, February 12, 2026.
The Board granted the General Counsel and Charging Party’s Requests for Special Permission to Appeal the Administrative Law Judge’s approval of a unilateral consent order. While these appeals were pending, the Board issued its decision in Metro Health, Inc. d/b/a Hospital Metropolitano Rio Piedras, 373 NLRB No. 89 (2024), overruling UPMC and its Subsidiary, UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, 365 NLRB 1418 (2017), and ending retroactively its practice of allowing cases to be resolved through consent order. Accordingly, the Board revoked the consent order and remanded the proceeding to the judge for further processing. Charges filed by Workers United, a/w with Service Employees International Union. Members Prouty, Murphy, and Mayer participated.
***
Appellate Court Decisions
No Appellate Court Decisions involving Board Decisions to report.
***
Administrative Law Judge Decisions
Starbucks Corporation (19-CA-325519 and 19-CA-326902; JD(SF)–03–26) Portland, OR. Administrative Law Judge John T. Giannopoulos issued his decision on February 9, 2026. Charges filed by Workers United Labor Union International, a/w Service Employees International Union.
Servicios Legales de Puerto Rico, Inc. (12-CA-301971, et al.; JD–10–26) San Juan, PR. Administrative Law Judge G. Rebekah Ramirez issued her decision on February 9, 2026. Charges filed by Union de Abogados y Abogadas de Servicios Legales and Union Independiente de Trabajadores de Servicios Legales.
***
To have the NLRB’s Weekly Summary of Cases delivered to your inbox each week, please subscribe here.