Español

|

The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, November 21, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday night at 11:00 pm ET through Saturday morning at about 9:00 am ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.
The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

close

Cases and Decisions

Gavel

Administrative Law Judge Decisions

After a Regional Director issues a complaint in an unfair labor practice case, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge hears the case and issues a decision and recommended order, which can then be appealed to the Board in Washington. If no exceptions are filed, the judge's order becomes the order of the Board. An administrative law judge's decision is not binding legal precedent in other cases unless it has been adopted by the Board on review of exceptions; these judges function much like trial court judges hearing a case without a jury. Such hearings are conducted at the locality where the unfair labor practice allegedly occurred. On occasion, administrative law judges also issue decisions in non-complaint, post-election representation cases that may be appealed to the Board.

Click here to search the Board's topical index (CiteNet).

Click here to subscribe to email delivery of Administrative Law Judge decisions.

Use this box to search the full text of all Administrative Law Judge Decisions, not just those on this page.

 

Case Number JD Number Case Name Judge Issuance Date sort ascending Board Outcome
25-CA-026277 JD-167-00 Paul Bogas 12/08/2000
25-CA-026869 JD-162-00 Karl H. Buschmann 12/06/2000
05-CA-028009 JD-156-00 William G. Kocol 11/30/2000
05-CB-008986 JD-152-00 Richard A. Scully 11/20/2000
17-CA-020046 JD(ATL)-31-00 Richard J. Linton 10/31/2000
11-CA-018576 JD(ATL)-54-00 Richard J. Linton 10/31/2000
14-CA-025921 JD-136-00 Richard H. Beddow, Jr. 10/27/2000
13-CA-038328 JD-142-00 Robert A. Giannasi 10/27/2000
04-CA-024627 JD-143-00 Richard H. Beddow, Jr. 10/27/2000
04-CA-024627 JD-143-00 Richard H. Beddow, Jr. 10/27/2000
07-CA-042474 JD-140-00 Martin J. Linsky 10/25/2000
07-CA-042474 JD-140-00 Martin J. Linsky 10/25/2000
17-CB-005282 JD-139-00 Jerry M. Hermele 10/24/2000
07-CA-042607 JD-137-00 Karl H. Buschmann 10/18/2000
08-CA-029599 JD-138-00 Eric M. Fine 10/18/2000
07-CA-042607 JD-137-00 Karl H. Buschmann 10/18/2000
08-CA-029599 JD-138-00 Eric M. Fine 10/18/2000
06-CA-030645 JD-134-00 Karl H. Buschmann 10/11/2000
06-CA-030645 JD-134-00 Karl H. Buschmann 10/11/2000
07-CA-042013 JD-133-00 Thomas R. Wilks 10/06/2000