Español

|

The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, November 21, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday night at 11:00 pm ET through Saturday morning at about 9:00 am ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.
The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

close

Cases and Decisions

Gavel

Administrative Law Judge Decisions

After a Regional Director issues a complaint in an unfair labor practice case, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge hears the case and issues a decision and recommended order, which can then be appealed to the Board in Washington. If no exceptions are filed, the judge's order becomes the order of the Board. An administrative law judge's decision is not binding legal precedent in other cases unless it has been adopted by the Board on review of exceptions; these judges function much like trial court judges hearing a case without a jury. Such hearings are conducted at the locality where the unfair labor practice allegedly occurred. On occasion, administrative law judges also issue decisions in non-complaint, post-election representation cases that may be appealed to the Board.

Click here to search the Board's topical index (CiteNet).

Click here to subscribe to email delivery of Administrative Law Judge decisions.

Use this box to search the full text of all Administrative Law Judge Decisions, not just those on this page.

 

Case Number JD Number Case Name Judge Issuance Date sort ascending Board Outcome
31-CA-026009 JD(SF)-50-03 DURA ART STONE, INC. William L. Schmidt 07/31/2003
17-CA-022625 JD(SF)-59-04 Deffenbaugh Disposal Services, Inc. Gregory Z. Meyerson 07/30/2003
12-CA-022630 JD(ATL)-49-03 Tradesmen International William M. Cates 07/29/2003
08-CA-033322 JD-77-03 Arvinmeritor, Inc. David Evans 07/29/2003
20-CA-031006 JD(SF)-48-03 ER REDWOOD EMPIRE Mary M. Cracraft 07/28/2003
27-CA-018206 JD(SF)-47-03 WAL-MART STORES, INC. Clifford H. Anderson 07/22/2003
13-CA-040188 JD-76-03 Fedex Freight East David Evans 07/22/2003
20-CA-031006 JD(SF)-48-03 Redwood Empire Mary M. Cracraft 07/21/2003
21-CA-035280 JD(SF)-49-03 Tarah Asphalt Products, Inc. Gregory Z. Meyerson 07/18/2003
04-CA-031577 JD-74-03 CCL PLASTIC PACKAGING, INC. Joseph Gontram 07/18/2003
03-CA-023939 JD(NY)-40-03 Essex County ARC Joel P. Biblowtiz 07/17/2003
08-CA-033664 JD-75-03 TNT Logistics William G. Kocol 07/16/2003
10-CA-034076 JD(ATL)-47-03 Carroll & Carroll Pargen Robertson 07/15/2003
29-CA-025320 JD(NY)-38-03 Phalanx Furniture, Inc. Steven Fish 07/15/2003
02-CA-034420 JD(NY)-39-03 United Creative Program Raymond P. Green 07/15/2003
34-CA-010286 JD-58-04 Verizon, Inc. Margaret Kern 07/14/2003
22-CA-025250 JD(NY)-37-03 Flowserve Corp. Steven Davis 07/11/2003
12-CA-022383 JD-70-03 Point Blank Body Armor Ira Sandron 07/10/2003
10-CA-034182 JD(ATL)-48-03 Madison Bosch Construction George Carson 07/09/2003
30-CA-016296 JD-73-03 Curran & Co. David Evans 07/08/2003