Español

|

The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, November 21, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday night at 11:00 pm ET through Saturday morning at about 9:00 am ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.
The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

close

Cases and Decisions

Gavel

Administrative Law Judge Decisions

After a Regional Director issues a complaint in an unfair labor practice case, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge hears the case and issues a decision and recommended order, which can then be appealed to the Board in Washington. If no exceptions are filed, the judge's order becomes the order of the Board. An administrative law judge's decision is not binding legal precedent in other cases unless it has been adopted by the Board on review of exceptions; these judges function much like trial court judges hearing a case without a jury. Such hearings are conducted at the locality where the unfair labor practice allegedly occurred. On occasion, administrative law judges also issue decisions in non-complaint, post-election representation cases that may be appealed to the Board.

Click here to search the Board's topical index (CiteNet).

Click here to subscribe to email delivery of Administrative Law Judge decisions.

Use this box to search the full text of all Administrative Law Judge Decisions, not just those on this page.

 

Case Number JD Number Case Name Judge Issuance Date sort ascending Board Outcome
25-CB-008630 JD-114-03 Electrical Workers IBEW, Local 16 Ira Sandron 11/12/2003
03-CA-023985 JD-116-03 Syracuse University Eric M. Fine 11/12/2003
06-CA-031556 JD-123-03 WalMart Stores William G. Kocol 11/12/2003
12-CA-022564 JD(ATL)-75-03 Palm Court Nursing Home George Carson 11/07/2003
18-CA-016902 JD-119-03 Consumer's Cooperative Jane Vandeventer 11/07/2003
32-CA-020008 JD(SF)-81-03 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP d/b/a ANG NEWSPAPERS Mary Miller Cracraft 11/06/2003
07-CA-046312 JD-118-03 Industrial Materials Clearance, Inc. David L. Evans 11/05/2003
25-CA-028591 JD-120-03 Hewlett Packard Co. Joseph Gontram 11/05/2003
12-CA-020882 JD(ATL)-74-03 Wal-Mart Stores Margaret G. Brakebush 11/04/2003
28-CA-018482 JD(SF)-76-03 Food City Gregory Z. Meyerson 11/04/2003
07-CA-046017 JD-117-03 Plymouth Court Karl H. Buschmann 11/04/2003
17-CA-021982 JD(SF)-79-03 ER HEDRICK MEDICAL CENTER Thomas M. Patton 11/03/2003
18-CA-016147 JD(SF)-71-03 North Star Marine Operators Albert Metz 10/29/2003
17-CA-21982-2 JD(SF)-79-03 Hedrick Medical Center Thomas P. Patton 10/29/2003
01-CA-033353 JD-113-03 RYAN IRON WORKS, INC. Martin J. Linsky 10/29/2003
04-CA-031757 JD-82-03 RCC Fabricators, Inc. Paul Buxbaum 10/23/2003
07-CA-045240 JD-112-03 THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY Jane Vandeventer 10/22/2003
16-CA-022865 JD(ATL)-70-03 Family Medical Center of Georgetown William N. Cates 10/20/2003
17-CA-022039 JD(SF)-74-03 ST. MARY’S HOSPITAL OF BLUE SPRINGS Gerald A. Wacknov 10/16/2003
26-CA-017345 JD(ATL)-71-03 Scepter Ingot Castings George Carson 10/15/2003