Skip to main content

The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, November 21, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday night at 11:00 pm ET through Saturday morning at about 9:00 am ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.
The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

Cases and Decisions

Gavel

Administrative Law Judge Decisions

After a Regional Director issues a complaint in an unfair labor practice case, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge hears the case and issues a decision and recommended order, which can then be appealed to the Board in Washington. If no exceptions are filed, the judge's order becomes the order of the Board. An administrative law judge's decision is not binding legal precedent in other cases unless it has been adopted by the Board on review of exceptions; these judges function much like trial court judges hearing a case without a jury. Such hearings are conducted at the locality where the unfair labor practice allegedly occurred. On occasion, administrative law judges also issue decisions in non-complaint, post-election representation cases that may be appealed to the Board.

Click here to search the Board's topical index (CiteNet).

Click here to subscribe to email delivery of Administrative Law Judge decisions.

 

Case Number JD Number Case Name Judge Issuance Date sort ascending Board Outcome
07-CA-047071 JD(ATL)-37-04 OGIHARA AMERICA CORPORATION George Carson II 07/12/2004
29-CA-025899 JD(NY)-31-04 ENJO Architectural Millwork Steven Davis 07/12/2004
09-CC-001660 JD-64-04 ER AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION Joseph Gontram 07/09/2004
12-CA-021464 JD(NY)-30-04 Goya Foods of Florida Raymond P. Green 07/02/2004
09-CC-001660 JD-64-04 AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION Joseph Gontram 07/02/2004
34-CA-009889 JD(NY)-12-04 Success Village Apartments, Inc. Steven Davis 06/30/2004
20-CA-031175 JD(SF)-45-04 Renzenberger Inc. Mary Miller Cracraft 06/30/2004
20-CA-031176 JD(SF)-45-04ER Renzenberger Inc. Mary Miller Cracraft 06/30/2004
04-CA-032421 JD-63-04 AEI2, LLC Jane Vandeventer 06/30/2004
04-CA-032606 JD-62-04 C. POLITIS & CO., INC. David L. Evans 06/29/2004
14-CA-027617 JD-61-04 CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT Bruce D. Rosenstein 06/28/2004
17-CA-022224 JD(SF)-51-04 Ozark Mountain Interiors Albert A. Metz 06/25/2004
28-CA-018553 JD(SF)-53-04 Chavey Electrical Contracting, Inc. James M. Kennedy 06/25/2004
11-CA-020209 JD(ATL)-36-04 STARCRAFT AEROSPACE, INC. John H. West 06/23/2004
01-CA-041158 JD-60-04 FIVE STAR TRANSPORTATION, INC. Arthur J. Amchan 06/23/2004
12-CA-023231 JD(ATL)-35-04 Indian River Memorial Hospital Michael A. Marcionese 06/22/2004
19-CA-029005 JD(SF)-50-04 Edison Electric John J. McCarrick 06/21/2004
29-CE-000120 JD(NY)-28-04 RWKS Comstock Raymond P. Green 06/18/2004
32-CA-020157 JD(SF)-49-04 San Ramon Regional Medical Center Gerald A. Wacknov 06/18/2004
32-CA-020575 JD(SF)-48-04 Operating Engineers James M. Kennedy 06/16/2004