Skip to main content

The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, November 21, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday night at 11:00 pm ET through Saturday morning at about 9:00 am ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.
The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

Cases and Decisions

Gavel

Administrative Law Judge Decisions

After a Regional Director issues a complaint in an unfair labor practice case, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge hears the case and issues a decision and recommended order, which can then be appealed to the Board in Washington. If no exceptions are filed, the judge's order becomes the order of the Board. An administrative law judge's decision is not binding legal precedent in other cases unless it has been adopted by the Board on review of exceptions; these judges function much like trial court judges hearing a case without a jury. Such hearings are conducted at the locality where the unfair labor practice allegedly occurred. On occasion, administrative law judges also issue decisions in non-complaint, post-election representation cases that may be appealed to the Board.

Click here to search the Board's topical index (CiteNet).

Click here to subscribe to email delivery of Administrative Law Judge decisions.

 

Case Number JD Number Case Name Judge Issuance Date sort ascending Board Outcome
30-CA-016997 JD-72-06 Rock Valley Trucking Co. Earl E. Shamwell Jr. 09/25/2006
02-CA-036943 JD(NY)-42-06 Cibao Meat Products Inc. Eleanor MacDonald 09/25/2006
29-CA-036943 JD(SF)-46-06 Crossing Rehabilitation Services Joseph Gontram 09/25/2006
19-CB-009427 JD(SF)-50-06 Jennings Distribution Inc. Gregory Z. Meyerson 09/25/2006
08-CA-032711 JD-71-06 Uniserv Karl H. Buschmann 09/22/2006
03-CA-025785 JD-69-06 Colacino Industries, Inc. Wallace H. Nations 09/21/2006
04-CA-034160 JD-65-06 Cintas Corporation Ira Sandron 09/20/2006
07-CB-015144 JD(ATL)-35-06 County Connection of Midland John H. West 09/19/2006
22-CA-027104 JD-70-06 Dish Network Services, LLC David I. Goldman 09/15/2006
29-CA-027247 JD(NY)-40-06 Igramo Enterprise, Inc. Raymond P. Green 09/15/2006
29-CA-027336 JD(NY)-39-06 McKenzie Drywall Finishers Corp. Joel P. Biblowitz 09/14/2006
09-CA-042153 JD-67-06 Oaks of West Kettering, Inc. Eric M. Fine 09/12/2006
21-CA-036866 JD(SF)-44-06 LVI, Inc. Wililam L. Schmidt 09/12/2006
32-CA-022464 JD(SF)-45-06 The Ford Store San Leandro Jay R. Pollack 09/12/2006
19-CA-030143 JD(SF)-47-06 Medco Health Solutions of Spokane, Inc. William G. Kocol 09/12/2006
19-CA-030154 JD(SF)-49-06 Virginia Mason Hospital Gregory Z. Meyerson 09/12/2006
06-CA-034608 JD-37-06 USPS (Pittsburgh Division) Paul Buxbaum 09/01/2006
02-CA-036296 JD(NY)-36-06 Matros Automated Electrical Raymond P. Green 09/01/2006
09-CA-041337 JD-64-06 American Postal Workers Union Richard A. Scully 08/31/2006
29-CA-021052 JD-66-06 EUGENE IOVINE, INC. David I. Goldman 08/31/2006