Skip to main content

The NLRB public website is scheduled to undergo routine maintenance from Friday, November 21, 2025, at 11:00 PM ET (8:00 PM PT) until Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 AM ET. From Friday night at 11:00 pm ET through Saturday morning at about 9:00 am ET, E-Filing will not be available. From Saturday through Monday morning, the E-Filing applications (E-Filing, Online Charge and Petition, and My Account Portal) may be periodically unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.
The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

News & Publications

Newspapers

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects Argument that President’s Removal of Former NLRB General Counsel was Improper, Upholding Validity of NLRB Complaint

Office of Public Affairs

202-273-1991

publicinfo@nlrb.gov

www.nlrb.gov

On behalf of the NLRB Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC:

On Friday, January 27, 2023, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a unanimous decision in Aakash Inc., DBA Park Central Care and Rehabilitation Center v. NLRB, rejecting the argument that President Biden’s removal of former NLRB General Counsel Peter Robb was improper.

In the decision authored by Judge Graber, and joined by Judges Wallach and Watford, the Court explained that the President’s power to remove derives from Article II of the Constitution and that no provision of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) curbed that power with respect to the NLRB General Counsel.  This is in stark contrast to Congress’s clear and unequivocal provision of removal protection for NLRB Members. Accordingly, the Court upheld the validity of the NLRB complaint at issue and enforced the Board’s bargaining order.

In April 2022, the Fifth Circuit’s opinion in Exela Enterprise Solutions, Inc. v. NLRB, also concluded that the President’s removal of General Counsel Robb was valid. In the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, the Court found “no reason to part ways with our sister circuit’s persuasive discussion.” 

The Aakash case was litigated in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by a team of NLRB attorneys from the Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Branch, as well as attorneys from the Department of Justice, with assistance from the NLRB’s Contempt, Compliance, and Special Litigation Branch.

“I’m proud of the team of talented and committed public servants from the NLRB and DOJ for their excellent job on this case. The Ninth Circuit’s thorough and well-reasoned decision joins the growing chorus upholding the removal and appointment actions of the President with respect to the NLRB and affirming the critical enforcement efforts of the Agency,” said General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo.

Established in 1935, the National Labor Relations Board is an independent federal agency that protects employees from unfair labor practices and protects the right of private sector employees to join together, with or without a union, to improve wages, benefits and working conditions. The NLRB conducts hundreds of workplace elections and investigates thousands of unfair labor practice charges each year.