Skip to main content

The NLRB reopened from shutdown status on November 13, 2025. Due dates to file or serve most documents were tolled during the period of the shutdown, although due dates cannot be tolled for filing and service of unfair labor practice charges, applications for awards of fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and certain representation petitions. For documents where tolling applies, the terms are that for each day on which the Agency’s offices were closed for all or any portion of the day, one day is added to the time for filing or service of the document. If the new due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the new due date will be moved to the next business day. For example, if the original due date was October 7, 2025 and the shutdown lasted 43 days, the revised due date is November 19, 2025. See chart for revised due dates.

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

News & Publications

Newspapers

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects Argument that President’s Removal of Former NLRB General Counsel was Improper, Upholding Validity of NLRB Complaint

Office of Public Affairs

202-273-1991

publicinfo@nlrb.gov

www.nlrb.gov

On behalf of the NLRB Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC

On Friday, April 22, 2022, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a unanimous decision in Exela v. NLRB rejecting the argument that the President’s removal of former NLRB General Counsel Peter Robb was improper.  The Court held that the President had the authority to remove and replace the NLRB’s General Counsel and thus, the NLRB’s complaint, issued by Acting General Counsel Peter Sung Ohr, was valid.  

In the decision authored by Judge Clement, and joined by Judges Stewart and Elrod, the Court explained that the President’s power to remove derives from Article II of the Constitution and that no provision of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) curbed that power with respect to the NLRB General Counsel.  This is in stark contrast to Congress’s clear and unequivocal provision of removal protection for NLRB Members.  Accordingly, the Court upheld the validity of the NLRB complaint at issue and enforced the Board’s order finding that Exela violated Sections 8(a)(1) and (5) of the NLRA.

The Court’s decision also notes that, in December 2021, the Board rejected a challenge to the legitimacy of General Counsel Robb’s removal and General Counsel Abruzzo’s subsequent appointment in a case called Aakash, Inc., 371 NLRB No. 46 (Dec. 30, 2021).  In that decision the Board noted that a recent Supreme Court decision “foreclosed any reasonable argument that the President lacked authority to remove [the] General Counsel.”

The Exela case was litigated in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by a team of NLRB attorneys from the Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Branch, as well as attorneys from the Department of Justice, with assistance from the NLRB’s Contempt, Compliance, and Special Litigation Branch.

General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo said, “The team of attorneys on this case did an excellent job representing the NLRB on this important issue. The Fifth Circuit’s well-reasoned decision will undoubtedly make a difference for employee rights throughout the country.”

Established in 1935, the National Labor Relations Board is an independent federal agency that protects employees from unfair labor practices and protects the right of private sector employees to join together, with or without a union, to improve wages, benefits and working conditions. The NLRB conducts hundreds of workplace elections and investigates thousands of unfair labor practice charges each year.