Administrative Law Judge Decisions
After a Regional Director issues a complaint in an unfair labor practice case, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge hears the case and issues a decision and recommended order, which can then be appealed to the Board in Washington. If no exceptions are filed, the judge's order becomes the order of the Board. An administrative law judge's decision is not binding legal precedent in other cases unless it has been adopted by the Board on review of exceptions; these judges function much like trial court judges hearing a case without a jury. Such hearings are conducted at the locality where the unfair labor practice allegedly occurred. On occasion, administrative law judges also issue decisions in non-complaint, post-election representation cases that may be appealed to the Board.
Click here to search the Board's topical index (CiteNet).
Click here to subscribe to email delivery of Administrative Law Judge decisions.
| Case Number | JD Number | Case Name | Judge |
Issuance
Date 
|
Board Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28-CA-297272 | JD(SF)-24-24 | TransPerfect Remote Interpreting, Inc. | ROBERT RINGLER | 08/13/2024 | Pending Board Decision |
| 31-CA-299074 | JD(SF)-18-24 | Starbucks Corporation | GERALD ETCHINGHAM | 06/28/2024 | Pending Board Decision |
| 16-CA-291891 | JD(SF)-11-24 | ACCEL LOGISTICS, INC. | ROBERT RINGLER | 03/27/2024 | Pending Board Decision |
| 03-CA-315203 | JD-19-24 | Starbucks Corporation | GEOFFREY CARTER | 03/26/2024 | Pending Board Decision |
| 20-CA-314296 | JD(SF)-07-24 | Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California | ROBERT RINGLER | 02/16/2024 | Pending Board Decision |
| 03-CA-295810 | JD(SF)-03-24 | Starbucks Corporation | ROBERT RINGLER | 02/06/2024 | Pending Board Decision |