History & Photos
Back to the Main Menu
|The first NLRB election was held in this firehouse in
Fort Wayne, Ind., December 1935, on behalf of workers
at Wayne Knitting Mills
||Wayne Knitting Mills, Fort Wayne, Indiana
Enforcement of the Wagner Act
|Steel Workers, Aliquippa, PA., July 1938.|
Constitutionality determined, the Board's problems were far from over. The budding agency was
besieged not only by employers, but by labor unions as well. As Chairman Madden observed,
"Employers almost universally did not welcome the Act"; many of them charged the Board with pro-labor
bias. While management's reaction to labor's "Magna Carta"
was not surprising, the American Federation of Labor's (AFL)
hostility to the Act and the Board was unanticipated.
Despite the hostility to the new law, the Board's caseload
rose 1,000 percent after the Jones and Laughlin decision,
prompting Congress to appropriate additional operating
funds, and the expansion of Board staff.
In this period, the Board was confronted with problems
arising from the deep split within the labor movement as to
whether the AFL should organize and represent industrial
workers in the largely unorganized mass production
industries. Since the 1890s, the AFL had focused on
craftsmen, largely ignoring industrial workers.
The tensions between the craft and industrial unions erupted
at an AFL convention in 1935. The industrial union leaders-
-including representatives of the United Mine Workers, the
Amalgamated Clothing Workers, Ladies' Garment Workers,
and International Typographical Unionóclashed openly with craftsmen leaders. In 1936 the industrial
unions formed the Committee for Industrial Organization (CIO) for the avowed purpose of organizing
industrial workers "to bring them under the banner of the AFL."
The AFL perceived the industrial unions' conduct as dual unionism and demanded that the committee
disband. The committee refused, and in August 1936, the AFL suspended most of the CIO unions
involved. The CIO reorganized itself into a permanent organization and changed its name to the
Congress of Industrial Organizations.
The problem of industrial versus craft unionism which the AFL and CIO leadership could not resolve
came to rest on the doorstep of the NLRB, then only five months old. The AFL charged that the Board
was pro-CIO. The CIO joined the fray from time to time to protest decisions favorable to the AFL.
The criticisms of the Board by management and labor came to a head in 1939 during a year-long series
of hearings conducted by Representative Howard A. Smith that culminated in December 1940. A leader
of the conservative bloc of the Democratic party, Smith charged the NLRB with a pro-union bias. He also
claimed the agency was dominated by left-wingers and had been infiltrated by Communists.